Why Choose Flutter Compositions

Flutter already offers many state-management and composition tools. Why add Flutter Compositions to the stack? This guide condenses the core advantages so you can quickly decide if it fits your project.

1. Developer Experience: Vue-like, but for Flutter

• setup() centralizes state initialization, computed values, and lifecycle hooks.
• APIs (ref(), computed(), watch()) mirror the Vue Composition API, lowering the learning curve for frontend developers.
• CompositionBuilder brings the same reactive experience to inline/one-off usages.

2. Fine-Grained Reactivity

Backed by alien_signals, reading .value registers dependencies automatically:

• Builders re-run only when a referenced Ref or ComputedRef changes.
• Wrap hot spots with ComputedBuilder to reduce rebuilds to the absolute minimum.
• provide / inject propagate reactive Refs without propagating rebuilds through the widget tree.

3. Lifecycle and Resource Management

Feature	Flutter Compositions	Result
Lifecycle hooks	onMounted, onUnmounted, onBuild	Easy-to-test, consistent with Vue naming
Controller helpers	useScrollController, useAnimationController, …	Auto-dispose at unmount, less boilerplate
Effect cleanup	Tied to _SetupContext	No forgotten subscriptions

4. Built-in, Type-Safe Dependency Injection

• InjectionKey<T> acts as the lookup key, so provide / inject can pass Ref<T> or any object while staying reactive.
• Generics participate in equality checks, preventing mismatched keys at compile time and runtime.
• Works out of the box, yet remains compatible with Riverpod, GetIt, and other DI solutions.

5. Hot Reload & State Preservation

• Each Ref keeps a stable position inside setup(). As long as the declaration order stays intact, hot reload preserves state.
• Builders rely on reactive signals, so only affected areas refresh after a reload.

6. Snapshot vs. Alternatives

Need	Flutter Compositions	flutter_hooks	Provider / BLoC
Vue-like syntax	✅ almost identical	⭕ conceptually similar	❌
Fine-grained updates	✅ built-in signals	⭕ manual widget splitting	❌ whole subtree rebuild
Auto controller disposal	✅ yes	⭕ depends on hook cleanup	❌ manual
Dependency injection	✅ built-in provide/inject	⭕ external package	⭕ external package
Ecosystem maturity	⭕ growing	✅ very mature	✅ very mature

For detailed breakdowns:

• Flutter Compositions vs flutter_hooks
• Flutter Compositions vs Vue Composition API

7. When It Shines

✅ You want a development model that feels like Vue Composition API.
✅ Performance matters and you need to avoid unnecessary rebuilds.
✅ Controllers, subscriptions, or effects must be consistently disposed.
✅ You value type-safe dependency injection without extra packages.
✅ The project targets multiple platforms but you want a unified reactive style.

8. When to Think Twice

❌ The app is tiny and setState already covers your needs.
❌ The team is deeply invested in flutter_hooks, BLoC, or Redux with heavy custom tooling.
❌ You prefer external/global state managers to drive the entire app.

9. Adoption Checklist

1. Identify key screens that can migrate to CompositionWidget or CompositionBuilder.
2. Wrap recurring resources into reusable use* composables.
3. Replace manual prop drilling with provide / inject where appropriate.
4. Encapsulate hot spots with ComputedBuilder or dedicated reusable widgets.
5. Follow the Creating Your Own Composables guide to build an internal library.

---

If you’re searching for a Flutter-native way to enjoy Vue-style composition, Flutter Compositions delivers precise reactivity, consistent lifecycle handling, and built-in DI. Master setup(), ref(), and provide/inject, and you’ll unlock a clean, maintainable architecture across mobile, desktop, and web.